Peer-reviewed scientific journals in which the main scientific results of dissertations must be published: Existing problems and ways to solve them

In the Russian Federation, there are two independent lists of scientific journals used in evaluating the research activities of organizations and/or authors: the “White List” of scientific journals and the “List of peer-reviewed scientific journals in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of Candidate of science, for the degree of Doctor of science” should be published, approved by the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC) under the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the HAC List). The HAC List is considered as one of the possible sources of replenishment of the “White List” of Russian journals, the purpose of which is to become the main source of information on the achievements of Russian scientists. Therefore, the qualitative level of the journals of the HAC List comes to the fore. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the system for selecting journals of the HAC List by analyzing the quality of their editorial policy and visibility to the scientific and educational community. The analysis was carried out using the data from the HAC List (as of July 2024), taking into account the distribution of journals into three categories obtained in accordance with the methodology for ranking and categorizing scientific journals of the HAC List, as well as in accordance with the RISC data. According to the results of the study, not all journals on the HAC List meet the basic requirements for journals: 46.6% of the 2,146 reviewed journals meet the visibility criteria for the scientific and educational community, and 72.1% meet the editorial policy quality criteria. At the same time, a clear correlation is observed between the categories assigned to the journals and the degree of compliance with the selected groups of criteria: the highest compliance was noted in the group of journals of the first category. Based on the results of the study, proposals were formulated for the formation of a transparent system for evaluating journals as the main element of a unified national system for evaluating scientific activity (the Unified State List of Scientific Journals– “White List”).

1. Kirillova O. V. On changes in the State scientific publishing policy, the “White List”, and the prospects for the development of Russian scholarly journals. Science Editor and Publisher. 2024;9(2):124–133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-24-22

2. Shorin О. N. Communication processes in the scientific environment. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2024;51(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688224010039

3. Trishchenko N. D., Makeenko M. I. The impact of open access on citation counts and alternative metrics of articles in leading international scientific journals on media and communication. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2024;17(8):1602–1611. (In Russ.)

4. Chernova O. A. The effect of Open Access on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals. Upravlenets / The Manager. 2022;13(4):69–82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-4-6

5. Yanochkina Yu. V. Open Access models of Russian academic journals. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2024;6(2):188–202. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.2.13

6. Popova N. G., Moiseenko Y. Y. Open Access: Panacea or Palliative? The Problems of Scientist and Scientific Groups Activity. 2023;(9):54–66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-9241-2023-9-54-66

7. Kozyrev A. N. Scientific journal as a digital platform. Digital Economy. 2022;(3):5–17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34706/DE-2022-03-01

8. Kuznetsova T. Yu., Silnichaya A. V., Evgrafova A. O. Choosing a language strategy for a top-rated Russian academic journal. Science Editor and Publisher. 2022;7(1):39–49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-22-06

9. Blaginin V. A., Goncharova M. N., Sokolova E. V. Going global: The scientometric development path of Russian academic journals in international reference databases. Upravlenets / The Manager. 2023;14(4):33–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-4-3

10. Komaritsa V. N. The use of multi-criteria methods to assess the citation potential of scientific articles. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2022;(6):29–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36535/0548-0019-2022-06-4

11. Guskov A. E., Shrayberg Ya. L. Challenges to develop scientometric studies. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2023;(2):37–58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-37-58

12. Romanova S. A., Trofimov Yu. V. The reached results and the prospect for the editorial policy. Academic Thought. 2021;(3):68–74. (In Russ.)

13. Sidorenko M. Yu. Interaction of formal and informal institutions in the editorial and publishing process of social sciences and humanities academic journals. The Problems of Scientist and Scientific Groups Activity. 2022;(8):239–252. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-9241-2022-8-239-252

14. Turgel I. D. Transformation priorities in the editorial policy of a Russian scientific journal in the context of international sanctions. Science Editor and Publisher. 2022;7(1):28–38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-22-03

15. Myslyakova Yu. G. Impact of peer review institute on scientific maturity of Russian journals. Science Editor and Publisher. 2022;7(1):50–59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-22-33

16. Demidenko S. Yu. The role of peer review in raising quality of scientific sociological knowledge (the case of Sociological Studies). Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2024;(10):80–91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524100077

17. Spasennikov V. V., Rytov M. Y., Androsov K. Y. Expert decision support system as a means of improving the quality of reviewing articles in a scientific journal. Ergodesign. 2022;(2):128–136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2022-2-128-136

18. Gureyev V. N., Mazov N. A. The role and significance of peer-review in Russian and foreign library and information science journals: a comparative analysis. Science Editor and Publisher. 2021;6(2):93–103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-21-03

19. Kirillova O. V., Tikhonova E. V. Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance. Science Editor and Publisher. 2022;7(1):12–27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-22-39

20. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A. The Russian economic journals market amid international isolation. Upravlenets / The Manager. 2022;13(4):15–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-4-2

21. Loskutova T. A. Present-day approaches to assessing quality of Russian academic journals. Baikal Research Journal. 2017;8(1):16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2017.8(1).16

22. Ilyina I. E., Borodik K. A. The methodological approach to the rating of scientific journals included in the list of peer-reviewed scientific publication that should publish the main scientific deliverables of PhD and a doctor of sciences theses. Juridical Education and Science. 2023;(1):5–14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1190-2023-1-5-14

23. Tsvetkova V. A., Mokhnacheva Y. V. Russian scientific journals in the structure of research process assessments. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2023;5(2):77–88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.5

24. Rubinstein A. Ya. About scientometric rankings and journal BACchanalia. HSE Economic Journal. 2023;27(2):290–305. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2023-27-2-290-305

25. Mazov N. A., Gureyev V. N., Ilicheva I. Y. Visibility of Russian university journals in the systems of national and international scientific and technical information. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2024;94(9):839–852 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587324090079

26. Tretyakova O. V. Higher certification commission list: Opportunities and limitations regarding the integration into the system for scientific research evaluation. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2024;94(12):1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587324120056

27. Pölönen J., Guns R., Kulczycki E., Sivertsen G., Engels T. C. E. National lists of scholarly publication channels: An overview and recommendations for their construction and maintenance. Journal of Data and Information Science. 2021;6(1):50–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0004

28. Tretyakova O. V. National lists of academic journals: An overview of world practice. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2023;15(3):20–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.3.020-039

29. Deutz D. B., Drachen T. M., Drongstrup D., Opstrup N., Wien C. Quantitative quality: a study on how performance-based measures may change the publication patterns of Danish researchers. Scientometrics. 2021;126(4):3303–3320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03881-7

30. Patwardhan B., Nagarkar S., Gadre S. R., Lakhotia S. C., Katoch V. M., Moher D. A critical analysis of the ‘UGC-approved list of journals’. Current Science. 2018;114(6):1299–1303. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i06/1299-1303

31. Sivertsen G. The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science. 2018;3(4):3–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0017

32. Kulczycki E. Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation. 2017;26(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023

33. Kochetkov D. M. Russian Journal Whitelist: Questions to be answered. Science Editor and Publisher. 2022;7(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-22-48

34. Kurdin A. A. The options of scientific research assessment under sanctions. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022;4(2):169–182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.2.15

35. Dyachenko E. L., Guba K. S., Potapov I. V., Mironenko A. Yu. Comparison of approaches to stratification of Russian journals: scientometric indicators, international databases and national lists. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2024;51(2):145–153. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688224700072

36. Mokhnacheva Y. V. Lists of journals and ratings of Russian publications: Inconsistencies and possible ways to eliminate them. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2024;6(2):147–167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.2.11

37. Tretyakova O. V. Russian experience with national rankings of academic journals: Mistakes, challenges, and prospects. Terra Economicus. 2023;21(3):102–121. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-3-102-121