Preview

Science Editor and Publisher

Advanced search

Essay on Academic Ethics

https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2017-1-1-16

Full Text:

Abstract

The essay considers historical development and current state of academic ethics. It is focused on the problems of Russian science. The authors treated ethics in its interrelation with the quality issues and scientometrics indicators. The authors also discussed the problems connected with the wide expansion of the Open Access movement. The ethical dilemma is treated as a contraposition of the categories «science» and «anti-science». This paper is initially meant to be an essay, the authors plan a profound scientific research on this subject further.

About the Author

D. M. Kochetkov
Ural Federal University ASEP Board for Ethics
Russian Federation


References

1. Платон. Теэтет. In: Собрание сочинений в 4-х томах Т. 2. Москва: Мысль; 1993. [Plato. The Theaetetus. In: Collection of Writings in 4 Volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1993 (in Russ.)]

2. Кант И. Основы метафизики нравственности. In: Сочинения в 6-ти томах Т. 4.

3. Москва: Мысль; 1965. [Kant I. Groundwork of the Methaphysic of Morals. In: The Collection of Writings in 6 Volumes. Vol. 4. (in Russ.)]

4. Bentham J. Deontology or the Science of Morality: In Two Volumes. Adegi Graphics LLC; 1999. 691 p.

5. Mill J. S. Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press; 1998. 157 p.

6. Stigler G. The Development of Utility Theory. I. Journal of Political Economy. 1950;58(4):307–327.

7. Pareto V. Course of Political Economy. In: Sociological Writings. London: Pall Mall Press; 1966.

8. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

9. Beall J. The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society. 2013;11(2):589–97. Available from: http://triplec.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/525

10. Bohannon J. Who’s Afraid of Peer Review? Science Magazine. 2013;342(October):60–5.

11. Finch J., Bell S., Bellingan L., Campbell R., Donnelly P., Gardner R. et al. Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications. 2013;75. Available from: www.researchinfonet. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Final-version.pdf

12. Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson; 1959.

13. Zietman A.L. Falsification, Fabrication, and Plagiarism: The Unholy Trinity of Scientific Writing. International Journal of Radiation Oncology. 2013;87(2):225–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.004.

14. Bhattacharjee Y. The Mind of a Con Man. The New York Times. 2013 Apr 26.


For citation:


Kochetkov D.M. Essay on Academic Ethics. Science Editor and Publisher. 2017;2(1):41-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2017-1-1-16

Views: 6599


ISSN 2542-0267 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8122 (Online)