Preview

Science Editor and Publisher

Advanced search

Duties of Members of Editorial Team in Academic Journal

https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2016-1-4-10-16

Full Text:

Abstract

The article presents the main editorial posts and duties of responsible editors in scholarly journals. Although each editorial team sets its own policy, there are common regulations for ethical conduct, which are endorsed by global editorial associations, such as the Committee on Publication Ethics, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the Council of Science Editors, and the World Association of Medical Editors. Guidelines of these associations are helpful for organizing a well-functioning editorial team, performing unbiased quality checks (peer review), and avoiding claims of illegitimate, or ‘predatory’, publishing. Journal editors should be skilled in substantive and ethical editing to contribute to the quality and international visibility of their publications. The role of chief editors is particularly important for selecting highly-skilled sections editors, arranging peer review, and publishing original and ethically sound research and reviews. Also, at the current stage of digitization and proliferation of periodicals, the role of research integrity editors, regional editors, statistical editors, art designers, and invited editors of special issues is gaining importance for international visibility and indexability of the journals.

About the Author

Armen Yu. Gasparyan
Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham
United Kingdom

Ph.D. The author was appointed Member of Council of the European Association of Science Editors and hold post of the Chief Editor of European Science Editing (2011–2014). He contributed to the Handbook of Science Editors and Guidelines of the Association. From 2008 onward, he is a member of the World Association of Medical Editors. He also holds editorial posts at several indexed medical journals.
Information presented in the article reflects the author’s stance, and is not associated with editorial policies of the international associations and journals.



References

1. Aguinis H., Vaschetto S. J. Editorial Responsibility: Managing the Publishing Process to Do Good and Do Well. Manage Organ. Rev. 2011;7(3): 407—422. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00223.x.

2. Aguinis H., Gottfredson R.K., Culpepper S.A., Dalton D.R., De Bruin G. P. Doing good and doing well: On the multiple contributions of journal editors. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 2013,12(4):564–578. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2012.0066.

3. Gasparyan A. Y. Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2013;28(7):972–973. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.7.972.

4. Willet P. The Characteristics of Journal Editorial Boards in Library and Information Science. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology. 2013;3(1):5–17. DOI: 10.5865/IJKCT.2013.3.1.005.

5. Amrein K., Langmann A., Fahrleitner-Pammer A., Pieber T.R., Zollner-Schwetz I. Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gend Med. 2011;8(6):378–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2011.10.007.

6. Cho A.H., Johnson S.A., Schuman C.E., Adler J.M., Gonzalez O., Graves S.J., Huebner J.R., Marchant D.B., Rifai S.W., Skinner I., Bruna E. M. Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management. PeerJ. 2014;2:e542. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.542.

7. Ioannidou E., Rosania A. Under-representation of women on dental journal editorial boards. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116630.

8. Li L., Zhang F. Developing English-language academic journals of China. Scientometrics. 2003;57(1):119–125. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023627704822.

9. Aronsky D., Haux R., Leong T.Y., McCray A. The Student Editorial Board of Methods of Information in Medicine — an opportunity to educate tomorrow’s peer reviewers. Methods Inf. Med. 2007;46(6):623–624.

10. Henly S.J., Bennett J.A., Dougherty M. C. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness. Nurs Outlook. 2010;58(4):188–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.04.004.

11. Motulsky, H.J. Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;172: 2126–2132. DOI: 10.1111/bph.12884.

12. Choi J., Jun J.H., Kang B.K., Kim K.H., Lee M.S. Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review. Trials. 2014;15:429. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.

13. Wu R., Glen P., Ramsay T., Martel G. Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review. Syst. Rev. 2014;3:70. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-70.

14. Nicolau I., Ling D., Tian L., Lienhardt C., Pai M. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 2013;17(9):1160–1169. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0050.

15. Assadi R., Gasparyan A. Yu. Editing, Publishing and Aggregating Video Articles: Do We Need a Scholarly Approach? J. Korean Med. Sci. 2015;30(9):1211–1212. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.9.1211.

16. Hall J., Hundley V., van Teijlingen E. The Journal editor: Friend or foe? Women Birth. 2015;28(2):e26–e29. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.008.

17. Gasparyan A.Y., Yessirkepov M., Gorin S.V., Kitas G.D. Educating science editors: is there a comprehensive strategy? Croat Med. J. 2014;55(6):672–675. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.672.

18. Clark J., Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h210.

19. CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update. URL: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/entire_whitepaper.pdf.

20. Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. URL: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_0.pdf.

21. Gasparyan A.Y., Ayvazyan L., Akazhanov N.A., Kitas G.D. Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Croat Med. J. 2013;54(6):600–608. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.600.

22. Gasparyan A.Y., Ayvazyan L., Gorin S.V., Kitas G. D. Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals. Croat Med. J. 2014;55(3):271–280. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.271.


For citation:


Gasparyan A.Yu. Duties of Members of Editorial Team in Academic Journal. Science Editor and Publisher. 2016;1(1-4):10-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2016-1-4-10-16

Views: 5778


ISSN 2542-0267 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8122 (Online)