Citation styles of references: A weakness of academic publishing

1. Burbules N. C. The paradigmatic differences between name/date and footnote styles of citation. In: Smeyers P., Depaepe M. (eds). Educational Research: Material Culture and Its Representation. Cham: Springer; 2013, pp. 191–199.

2. Long T. L. A history of citation styles. Nurse Author & Editor. 2019;29(3):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4910.2019.tb00048.x

3. Kratochvíl J. Comparison of the accuracy of bibliographical references generated for medical citation styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2017;43(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.09.001

4. Leslie D. M., Hamilton M. J. Multitude of reference styles delays publication. Nature. 2003;424(6945):127–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/424127c

5. Friedberg E. C. Call for a cull of pointlessly different reference styles. Nature. 2005;437(7063):1232. https://doi.org/10.1038/4371232a

6. Harries A. D., Kumar A. M. V., Satyanarayana S., Bissell K., Hinderaker S. G., Edginton M. et al. References for scientific papers: why not standardise to one global style? Public Health Action. 2013;3(3):255–257. https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.13.0066