Preview

Science Editor and Publisher

Advanced search

Open review: essence, perspectives, challenges of organization

https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2018-1-2-33-37

Full Text:

Abstract

Peer-review is of utmost importance in the course of scientific work for expert evaluation allows checking the validity of acquired data as well as make the style of the work in question more appropriate for the target audience. Out of the three existing types of peer review the double-blind one is dominant among Russian scientific journals. The question of its possible substitution by open review, however, has become the focus of numerous discussions rather often of late. The current article deals with the concept of open peer review that has formed inRussiaas opposed to the European one, illustrated by Elsevier’s project of publishing full texts of reviews. The perspectives of such a type of expert evaluation are investigated as well as challenges that might arise when introducing into Russian editorial and publishing practice. 

About the Author

E. G. Nozhevnikova
N.A. Dobrolubov Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University
Russian Federation

Elena G. Nozhevnikova, Cand. Sci. (Philology), assistant professor at the English Philology Department of the N.A. Dobrolubov Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University, 1st Category Librarian, till September 2017 Executive Secretary of the “Vestnik of Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University”

Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Байков А. А., Истомин И. А. Комплект методических материалов по стандартам научного рецензирования. М.; 2015. Режим доступа: http://www.intertrends.ru/system/Doc/News/35/teaching-materials.pdf.

2. Ross-Hellauer T. What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Res. 2017;(6):588. DOI: 10.12688/ f1000research.11369.2.

3. Eighth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. Available at: https://www.alpsp.org/Reports-Publications/20180126peerreviewcongress.

4. Mehmani B. Pilot designed to help reviewers win recognition leads to better quality reviews, say editors. September 26, 2016. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/peer-review/pilot-designed-to-help-reviewers-win-recognition-for-their-work-leads-to-better-quality-reviews,-say-editors.

5. Mehmani B., van Rossum J. Elsevier trials publishing peer review reports as articles. February 24, 2015. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/peer-review/elsevier-pilot-trials-publishing-peer-review-reports-as-articles.


For citation:


Nozhevnikova E.G. Open review: essence, perspectives, challenges of organization. Science Editor and Publisher. 2018;3(1-2):33-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2018-1-2-33-37

Views: 710


ISSN 2542-0267 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8122 (Online)