Preview

Science Editor and Publisher

Advanced search

Article processing charges for open access publication — the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada

https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2017-2-4-89-106

Full Text:

Abstract

Background. Open access (OA) publishing via article processing charges (APCs) is growing as an alternative to subscription publishing. The Pay It Forward (PIF) Project is exploring the feasibility of transitioning from paying subscriptions to funding APCs for faculty at research intensive universities. Estimating of the cost of APCs for the journals authors at research intensive universities tend to publish is essential for the PIF project and similar initiatives. This paper presents our research into this question.

Methods . We identified APC prices for publications by authors at the 4 research intensive United States (US) and Canadian universities involved in the study. We also obtained APC payment records from several Western European universities and funding agencies. Both data sets were merged with Web of Science (WoS) metadata. We calculated the average APCs for articles and proceedings in 13 discipline categories published by researchers at research intensive universities. Wealso identified 41 journals published by traditionally subscription publishers which have recently converted to APC funded OA and recorded the APCs they charge.

Results . We identified 7629 payment records from the 4 European APC payment databases and 14 356 OA articles authored by PIF partner university faculty for which we had listed APC prices. APCs for full OA journals published by PIF authors averaged 1775 USD; full OA journal APCs paid by Western European funders averaged 1865 USD; hybrid APCs paid by Western European funders averaged 2887 USD. The APC for converted journals published by major subscription publishers averaged 1825 USD. APC funded OA is concentrated in the life and basic sciences. APCs funded articles in the social sciences and humanities are often multidisciplinary and published in journals such as PLOS ONE that largely publish in the life sciences.

Conclusions . Full OA journal APCs average a little under 2000 USD while hybrid articles average about 3000 USD for publications by researchers at research intensive universities. There is a lack of information on discipline differences in APCs due to the concentration of APC funded publications in a few fields and the multidisciplinary nature of research.

About the Authors

D. Solomon
Michigan State University
United States

David Solomon, Internal Medicine/Office of Medical Education Research and Development 

Lansing, MI



B.-C. Björk
Hanken School of Economics
Finland

Bo-Christer Björk, Information Systems Science

Helsinki



References

1. Solomon D. J., Laakso J., Björk B.-C. A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics. 2013;7(3):642–650. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.008.

2. Neylon C. Growth of Open Access Major Publishers. OASPA. Figshare; 2013. URL: https://figshare.com/articles/Growth_of_Open_Access_Major_Publishers/650799.

3. Solomon D. J., Björk B.-C. A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012;63(8):1485–1495. DOI: 10.1002/asi.22673.

4. Lara K. Open Access Library Survey. An investigation of the role of libraries in open access funding and support within institutions. 2014. URL: http://www.pcgplus.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PCG-Open-Access-Library-Survey-2014.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2016).

5. Smith M. Pay it forward: investigating a sustainable model of open access article processing charges for large North American research institutions. 2014. URL: http://icis.uc-davis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/UC-Pay-It-For-ward-narrative-2014-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 22 June 2016).

6. Björk B.-C., Solomon D. Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges. 2014. URL: https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/developing-effective-market-for-open-access-article-processing-charges-mar14.pdf.

7. Cohen H. How to write a patient case report. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2006;63(19):1888– 1892. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp060182.

8. Morrison H., Salhab J., Calve-Genest A., Horava T. Open Access Article Processing Charges. DOAJ Survey Publications. 2015;3(1):1–16. DOI: 10.3390/publications3010001.

9. Pinfield S., Salter J., Bath P.A. The total cost of publication’ in a hybrid open-access environment: institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2016;67(7):1751– 1766. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23446 .

10. House of Commons. Open access: Responses to the committee’s fifth report of session 2013–14 – Business, Innovation and Skills Committee: Government response. London: UK Parliament; 2014. URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmbis/833/83304.%htm.

11. Lawson S. RCUKAPC data (2013–14). Figshare; 2014. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1180122.

12. Kiley R. Wellcome Trust APC spend 2012–13: data file. Figshare; 2014. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.963054.v1.

13. Kiley R. Wellcome Trust open access (OA) spend and compliance monitoring: 2013–14. Figshare; 2015. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1321361.v5.

14. Apel J., Becker H.-G., Bertelmann R., Beucke D., Blume P., Blumtritt U., Busjahn D., Deinzer G., Dorner A., Engelhardt C., Hell D., Herb U., Feldsien-Sudhaus I., Franke F., Frick C., Geißelmann A., Geschuhn K. K., Kuehle G., Jaeger D., Kroiss S., Lucht-Roussel K., Lützenkirchen F., Oberländer A., Peil V., Pieper D., Pohlmann T., Schlachter M., Ruckelshausen F., Schlegel B., Sikora A., Tullney M., Vieler A., Witt S., Jahn N. Dataset Fees paid by German Research Institutions. Bielefeld University; 2015. DOI: 10.4119/UNIBI/UB.2014.18.

15. Reckling F., Kenzian M. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Publication Cost Data 2013. Figshare; 2014. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.988754.

16. Reckling F., Rieck K. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Publication Cost Data 2014. Figshare; 2015. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1378610.v12.

17. SCOAP3 Journals. 2015. Available at: https://scoap3.org/scoap3journals/ (accessed on April 2016).

18. Björk B.-C., Solomon D.J. Pricing principles used by scholarly open access publishers. Learned Publishing. 2012;25(3):132–137. DOI: 10.1087/20120207.

19. Björk B.-C. The open access movement at a crossroads – are the big publishers and academic social media taking over? Learned Publishing. 2016;29(2):131–134. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1021.

20. Schimmer R., Geschuhn K.K., Vogler A. Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. 2015. DOI: 10.17617/1.3.

21. Shearer K. Report on Berlin 12 Open Access Conference. 2016. URL: http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/pub-lications/2015.12.18-Berlin12Report%.pdf (accessed on April 2016).


Review

For citations:


Solomon D., Björk B. Article processing charges for open access publication — the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. Science Editor and Publisher. 2017;2(2-4):89-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2017-2-4-89-106

Views: 1387


ISSN 2542-0267 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8122 (Online)