How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers

1. Bhopal R., Rankin J., McColl E. et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ. 1997;314:1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009

2. Goodman N. W. Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. BMJ. 1994;309:1482. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1482

3. Dickersin K., Scherer R., Suci E. S. T., Gil-Montero M. Problems with indexing and citation of articles with group authorship. JAMA. 2002;287:2772–2774. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2772

4. Epstein R. J. Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? BMJ. 1993;306:765–767. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6880.765

5. Horton R. The signature of responsibility. Lancet. 1997;350:5–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66236-8 Hudson Jones A., McLellan F. Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA, 2000.

6. ICMJE criteria: www.icmje.org also Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000;133:229–231.

7. Rennie D., Flanagin A., Yank V. The contributions of authors. JAMA. 2000;284:89–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.284.1.89

8. Resnik D. B. A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science. Science & Engineering Ethics.

9. ;3:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5

10. Smith J. Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice? BMJ. 1994;309:1456–1457. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1456