COPE Council. COPE Discussion document: Predatory publishing. Version 1. November 2019

1. Cobey K. D., Lalu M. M., Skidmore B., Ahmadzai N., Grudniewicz A., Moher D. What is a predatory journal? A scoping review [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research. 2018;7:1001. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2

2. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489:179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a

3. Clark J., Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h210

4. Shamseer L., Moher D., Maduekwe O., et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine. 2017;15:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

5. Shen C., Björk B.-C. ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine. 2015;13:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2

6. Predatory or deceptive publishers – Recommendations for Caution. Council of Science Editors (CSE). CSE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lSd2UQ

7. Withdrawal of accepted manuscript from predatory journal. COPE Case number 16-22. COPE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2LaYOY4

8. Laine C., Winker M. A. Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. World Association of Medical Editors site. 18 February 2017. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2jWvT0p

9. Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, World Association of Medical Editors. Version 3, 2018. COPE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lzGpLo

10. Butler D. Sham journals scam authors. Nature. 2013;495:421–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/495421a

11. Carroll C. W. Spotting the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Predatory open access publications. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2016;8(5):662–664. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00128.1

12. Eriksson S., Helgesson G. The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2017;20:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3

13. Crotty D. Predatory publishing as a rational response to poorly governed academic incentives. The Scholarly Kitchen 28 February 2017. https://bit.ly/2lwM19l

14. Deprez E. E., Chen C. Medical journals have a fake news problem. Bloomberg Businessweek 29 August 2017. https://bloom.bg/2mfvS8K

15. Anderson R. Should we retire the term “Predatory publishing”? The Scholarly Kitchen 11 May 2015. https://bit.ly/2zr0NCe

16. Frandsen T. F. Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learned Publishing. 2019;32:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1214

17. Curry M. J., Lillis T. The dangers of English as lingua franca of journals. Inside Higher Ed. 13 March 2018. https://bit.ly/2kC2GZf

18. Offord C. German scientists frequently publish in predatory journals. The Scientist. 19 July 2018. https://bit.ly/2kOu3iv

19. Court rules in FTC’s favor against predatory academic publisher OMICS Group; Imposes $50.1 million judgment against defendants that made false claims and hid publishing fees. US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). FTC site. 3 April 2019. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lRcM8G