Herbivore journals vs predatory journals – the battle is already lost, what’s next?

The authors divided scientific journals into two main categories – “herbivore journals” (subscription journals that do not charge authors for the publication of their articles) and “predatory journals” – paid journals that adhere to unscrupulous editorial and ethical policies. Accordingly, “predatory publishers” are those companies that publish “predatory journals”. As a rule, articles by these publishers are published in the open access mode. The criteria by which scientific publications are classified as “predatory” are considered. It is emphasized that the “charging” nature of the publication does not necessarily make it “predatory”, but creates a situation in which the publisher using the “gold” open access is almost always interested in the maximum number of published works with a significant reduction in the quality requirements for manuscripts sent to the editorial office. The situation with the Jeffrey Beall’s list is briefly considered – the history of its appearance, the criteria for including publishers and some individual journals in it, possible reasons for the abolition, access to the list today. The possible reasons are analyzed why scientists publish in paid journals instead of submitting their articles to free subscription editions, the rating of which, as a rule, is even higher. Considerations of the authors of this article regarding the clear non-obviousness of the advantages of publications in the open access mode for a lot of money are outlined. The current situation with the MDPI publisher, which is very popular among modern scientists and which Jeffrey Bill (and not only him) nevertheless refers to as “predatory” is considered in detail. It is emphasized that the established principles of the existence of “predatory journals” primarily satisfy the authors of the articles themselves, who are attracted by both the speed and the “high guarantee” of the publication process.

1. Хохлов А.Н., Моргунова Г.В. Научные публикации – хорошие, плохие, за пригоршню долларов. Научный редактор и издатель. 2021;6(1):59–67. http://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2021-1-59-67

2. Beall J. What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica (Zagreb). 2017;27(2):273–278. http://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029

3. Beall J. “Predatory” open-access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor. 2010;11(4):10–17.

4. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489(7415):179. http://doi.org/10.1038/489179a

5. Beall J. Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access. Learned Publishing. 2013;26(2):79–84. http://doi.org/10.1087/20130203

6. Beall J. Open access, research communities, and a defense against predatory journals. Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics. 2021;2(1):14–17. http://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2021.2.1.02

7. Kendall G. Beall’s legacy in the battle against predatory publishers. Learned Publishing. 2021; 34(3):379–388. http://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1374

8. Kirpichnikov M.P., Khokhlov A.N. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin – a new era of evolution (2007–2013). Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin. 2014;69(3):93–96. http://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392514030110

9. Morgunova G.V., Khokhlov A.N., Kirpichnikov M. P. To the 70th anniversary of the journal Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. News from biologists. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin. 2016;71(1):1–3. http://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392516110018

10. Kirpichnikov M.P., Morgunova G.V., Khokhlov A.N. Our journal – 2020: what and how we publish. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin. 2020;75(1):1–6. http://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392520010034

11. Khokhlov A.N. How scientometrics became the most important science for researchers of all specialties. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin. 2020;75(4):159–163. http://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392520040057

12. Oviedo-García M.Á. Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Research Evaluation. 2021;30(3):405–419. http://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab020

13. Khokhlov A.N. Gerontology and scientometrics (“Citogerontology”). Bioinformatics of genome regulation and structure/systems biology (BGRS/SB-2020): The twelfth international multiconference, Novosibirsk, 6–10 July 2020; Abstracts. Novosibirsk: ICG SB RAS; 2020, pp. 648–649. http://doi.org/10.18699/BGRS/SB-2020-396