scieditorScience Editor and PublisherНаучный редактор и издатель2542-02672541-8122АНРИ10.24069/SEP-23-19scieditor-375Research ArticlePUBLISHING ETHICSИЗДАТЕЛЬСКАЯ ЭТИКАPaper mills, fraudulent authors, and editorial responses«Бумажные фабрики», недобросовестные авторы и ответы редакцийСмартП.SmartP.
Оксфорд
Oxford
pippa.smart@gmail.comPSP ConsultingВеликобританияPSP ConsultingUnited Kingdom202324022024815056Copyright © Smart P., 20242024Смарт П.Smart P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/375
.
.
ReferencesBailey J. 5 Historical moments that shaped plagiarism. Turnitin; 2019. Available at: https://www.turnitin.com/blog/5-historical-moments-that-shaped-plagiarism (accessed: 06.07.2023).Bailey J. 5 Historical moments that shaped plagiarism. Turnitin; 2019. Available at: https://www.turnitin.com/blog/5-historical-moments-that-shaped-plagiarism (accessed: 06.07.2023).Gallwey T. Plagiarism or coincidence: which? Irish Monthly. 1879;7:312–319. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20502377 (accessed: 06.07.2023).Gallwey T. Plagiarism or coincidence: which? Irish Monthly. 1879;7:312–319. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20502377 (accessed: 06.07.2023).Oransky I. The first-ever English language retraction (1756)? RetractionWatch; 2012. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2012/02/27/the-first-ever-english-language-retraction-1756 (accessed: 06.07.2023).Oransky I. The first-ever English language retraction (1756)? RetractionWatch; 2012. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2012/02/27/the-first-ever-english-language-retraction-1756 (accessed: 06.07.2023).National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF’s research misconduct regulation (45 C.F.R. part 689). NSF, pp. 237–242. Available at: https://oig.nsf.gov/sites/default/files/document/2021-08/45-CFR-689.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2023).National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF’s research misconduct regulation (45 C.F.R. part 689). NSF, pp. 237–242. Available at: https://oig.nsf.gov/sites/default/files/document/2021-08/45-CFR-689.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2023).Langdon-Neuner E. Medical ghost-writing. Mens Sana Monographs. 2008;6(1):257–273. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.33006Langdon-Neuner E. Medical ghost-writing. Mens Sana Monographs. 2008;6(1):257–273. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.33006World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. WAME; 2005. Available at: https://wame.org/ghost-writing-initiated-commercial-companies (accessed: 06.07.2023).World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. WAME; 2005. Available at: https://wame.org/ghost-writing-initiated-commercial-companies (accessed: 06.07.2023).Flanagin A., Carey L. A., Fontanarosa P. B., Phillips S. G., Pace B. P., Lundberg G. D., Rennie D. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):222–224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222Flanagin A., Carey L. A., Fontanarosa P. B., Phillips S. G., Pace B. P., Lundberg G. D., Rennie D. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):222–224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP). ISMPP code of ethics. ISMPP; 2019. Available at: https://www.ismpp.org/code-of-ethics-a (accessed: 06.07.2023).International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP). ISMPP code of ethics. ISMPP; 2019. Available at: https://www.ismpp.org/code-of-ethics-a (accessed: 06.07.2023).Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Systematic manipulation of the publication process. COPE; 2021. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.23Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Systematic manipulation of the publication process. COPE; 2021. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.23International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Defining the role of authors and contributors. ICMJE; 2023. Available at: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-andresponsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (accessed: 06.07.2023).International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Defining the role of authors and contributors. ICMJE; 2023. Available at: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-andresponsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (accessed: 06.07.2023).Bavdekar S. B. Authorship issues. Lung India. 2012;29(1):76–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.92371Bavdekar S. B. Authorship issues. Lung India. 2012;29(1):76–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.92371Ioannidis J. P., Klavans R., Boyack K. W. Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature. 2018;561:167–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8Ioannidis J. P., Klavans R., Boyack K. W. Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature. 2018;561:167–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8Abrahams M. Man at work: spreading the word about Struchkov. The Guardian; 2008. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2008/mar/11/highereducation.research (accessed: 06.07.2023).Abrahams M. Man at work: spreading the word about Struchkov. The Guardian; 2008. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2008/mar/11/highereducation.research (accessed: 06.07.2023).Hvistendahl M. China’s publication bazaar. Science. 2013;342(6162):1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6162.1035Hvistendahl M. China’s publication bazaar. Science. 2013;342(6162):1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6162.1035Marcus A. Exclusive: Russian site says it has brokered authorships for more than 10,000 researchers. Retraction Watch; 2019. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2019/07/18/exclusive-russian-sitesays-it-has-brokered-authorships-for-more-than-10000-researchers (accessed: 06.07.2023).Marcus A. Exclusive: Russian site says it has brokered authorships for more than 10,000 researchers. Retraction Watch; 2019. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2019/07/18/exclusive-russian-sitesays-it-has-brokered-authorships-for-more-than-10000-researchers (accessed: 06.07.2023).Wikipedia. Paper mill. Wikimedia Foundation. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_mill (accessed: 06.07.2023).Wikipedia. Paper mill. Wikimedia Foundation. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_mill (accessed: 06.07.2023).Filion G. A flurry of copycats on PubMed. The Grand Locus; 2014. Available at: https://blog.thegrandlocus.com/2014/10/a-flurry-of-copycats-on-pubmed (accessed: 06.07.2023).Filion G. A flurry of copycats on PubMed. The Grand Locus; 2014. Available at: https://blog.thegrandlocus.com/2014/10/a-flurry-of-copycats-on-pubmed (accessed: 06.07.2023).Oransky I. Physics publisher retracting nearly 500 likely paper mill papers. Retraction Watch; 2022. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2022/09/09/physics-publisher-retracting-nearly-500-likelypaper-mill-papers (accessed: 07.07.2023).Oransky I. Physics publisher retracting nearly 500 likely paper mill papers. Retraction Watch; 2022. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2022/09/09/physics-publisher-retracting-nearly-500-likelypaper-mill-papers (accessed: 07.07.2023).Kincaid E. Wiley and Hindawi to retract 1,200 more papers for compromised peer review. Retraction Watch; 2023. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2023/04/05/wiley-and-hindawi-to-retract-1200-more-papers-for-compromised-peer-review (accessed: 07.07.2023).Kincaid E. Wiley and Hindawi to retract 1,200 more papers for compromised peer review. Retraction Watch; 2023. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2023/04/05/wiley-and-hindawi-to-retract-1200-more-papers-for-compromised-peer-review (accessed: 07.07.2023).Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); STM. Paper mills: research report from COPE & STM. Version 1. https://doi.org/10.24318/jtbG8IHLCommittee on Publication Ethics (COPE); STM. Paper mills: research report from COPE & STM. Version 1. https://doi.org/10.24318/jtbG8IHLPerron B. E., Hiltz-Perron O. T., Victor B. G. Revealed: the inner workings of a paper mill. Retraction Watch; 2021. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/20/revealed-the-inner-workings-ofa-paper-mill (accessed: 06.07.2023).Perron B. E., Hiltz-Perron O. T., Victor B. G. Revealed: the inner workings of a paper mill. Retraction Watch; 2021. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/20/revealed-the-inner-workings-ofa-paper-mill (accessed: 06.07.2023).Bishop D. V. Red flags for paper mills need to go beyond the level of individual articles: a case study of Hindawi special issues [Preprint]. Posted 2023 Feb 7. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6mbgvBishop D. V. Red flags for paper mills need to go beyond the level of individual articles: a case study of Hindawi special issues [Preprint]. Posted 2023 Feb 7. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6mbgvByrne J. A., Christopher J. Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century: how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters. 2020;594(4):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747Byrne J. A., Christopher J. Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century: how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters. 2020;594(4):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.