scieditorScience Editor and PublisherНаучный редактор и издатель2542-02672541-8122АНРИ10.24069/SEP-22-45scieditor-304Research ArticlePUBLISHING ETHICSИЗДАТЕЛЬСКАЯ ЭТИКАCOPE Flowcharts and infographics – General approach to publication ethics for the editorial officeОбщий подход к публикационной этике для редакции. Блок-схема COPEРедакционнаястатьяEditorialArticle20221504202372221221Copyright © Editorial a., 20232023Редакционная с.Editorial a.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/304
.
Перевод С. П. Зернес
ReferencesPrinciples of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12 (Transl. in Russ.: Принципы прозрачности и лучшие практики научного издания. Режим доступа: https://rassep.ru/sovet-po-etike/mezhdunarodnayapraktika/kodeksy-cope/?ELEMENT_ID=112003)Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12 (Transl. in Russ.: Принципы прозрачности и лучшие практики научного издания. Режим доступа: https://rassep.ru/sovet-po-etike/mezhdunarodnayapraktika/kodeksy-cope/?ELEMENT_ID=112003)Yentis S, on behalf of COPE Council. Sharing of information among editors-in-chief regarding possible misconduct, version 1, March 2015. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.7Yentis S, on behalf of COPE Council. Sharing of information among editors-in-chief regarding possible misconduct, version 1, March 2015. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.7Wager E., Kleinert S., on behalf of COPE Council. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), version 1, March 2012. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2018.1.3Wager E., Kleinert S., on behalf of COPE Council. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), version 1, March 2012. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2018.1.3
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.