scieditorScience Editor and PublisherНаучный редактор и издатель2542-02672541-8122АНРИ10.24069/SEP-22-30scieditor-254Research ArticlePUBLISHING ETHICSИЗДАТЕЛЬСКАЯ ЭТИКАCOPE Council. COPE Discussion document: Predatory publishing. Version 1. November 2019Совет COPE. Хищническое издание: дискуссионный документ. Версия 1. Ноябрь 2019РедакционнаястатьяEditorialArticle2022180820227199109Copyright © Editorial a., 20222022Редакционная с.Editorial a.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/254
.
Редакция журнала выражает благодарность представителям члена АНРИ Государственного университета морского и речного флота имени адмирала С.О. Макарова (г. Санкт-Петербург) и лично Артему Александровичу Буцанцу и Александре Анатольевне Ивановой за перевод материала.The Editorial Staff of the Journal expresses gratitude to the member of ASEP / ANRI – Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping (St. Petersburg), Artem A. Butsanets and Alexandra A. Ivanova for the translation of the material.ReferencesCobey K. D., Lalu M. M., Skidmore B., Ahmadzai N., Grudniewicz A., Moher D. What is a predatory journal? A scoping review [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research. 2018;7:1001. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2Cobey K. D., Lalu M. M., Skidmore B., Ahmadzai N., Grudniewicz A., Moher D. What is a predatory journal? A scoping review [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research. 2018;7:1001. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489:179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179aBeall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489:179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179aClark J., Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h210Clark J., Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h210Shamseer L., Moher D., Maduekwe O., et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine. 2017;15:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9Shamseer L., Moher D., Maduekwe O., et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine. 2017;15:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9Shen C., Björk B.-C. ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine. 2015;13:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2Shen C., Björk B.-C. ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine. 2015;13:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2Predatory or deceptive publishers – Recommendations for Caution. Council of Science Editors (CSE). CSE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lSd2UQPredatory or deceptive publishers – Recommendations for Caution. Council of Science Editors (CSE). CSE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lSd2UQWithdrawal of accepted manuscript from predatory journal. COPE Case number 16-22. COPE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2LaYOY4Withdrawal of accepted manuscript from predatory journal. COPE Case number 16-22. COPE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2LaYOY4Laine C., Winker M. A. Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. World Association of Medical Editors site. 18 February 2017. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2jWvT0pLaine C., Winker M. A. Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. World Association of Medical Editors site. 18 February 2017. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2jWvT0pPrinciples of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, World Association of Medical Editors. Version 3, 2018. COPE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lzGpLoPrinciples of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, World Association of Medical Editors. Version 3, 2018. COPE site. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lzGpLoButler D. Sham journals scam authors. Nature. 2013;495:421–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/495421aButler D. Sham journals scam authors. Nature. 2013;495:421–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/495421aCarroll C. W. Spotting the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Predatory open access publications. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2016;8(5):662–664. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00128.1Carroll C. W. Spotting the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Predatory open access publications. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2016;8(5):662–664. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00128.1Eriksson S., Helgesson G. The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2017;20:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3Eriksson S., Helgesson G. The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2017;20:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3Crotty D. Predatory publishing as a rational response to poorly governed academic incentives. The Scholarly Kitchen 28 February 2017. https://bit.ly/2lwM19lCrotty D. Predatory publishing as a rational response to poorly governed academic incentives. The Scholarly Kitchen 28 February 2017. https://bit.ly/2lwM19lDeprez E. E., Chen C. Medical journals have a fake news problem. Bloomberg Businessweek 29 August 2017. https://bloom.bg/2mfvS8KDeprez E. E., Chen C. Medical journals have a fake news problem. Bloomberg Businessweek 29 August 2017. https://bloom.bg/2mfvS8KAnderson R. Should we retire the term “Predatory publishing”? The Scholarly Kitchen 11 May 2015. https://bit.ly/2zr0NCeAnderson R. Should we retire the term “Predatory publishing”? The Scholarly Kitchen 11 May 2015. https://bit.ly/2zr0NCeFrandsen T. F. Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learned Publishing. 2019;32:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1214Frandsen T. F. Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learned Publishing. 2019;32:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1214Curry M. J., Lillis T. The dangers of English as lingua franca of journals. Inside Higher Ed. 13 March 2018. https://bit.ly/2kC2GZfCurry M. J., Lillis T. The dangers of English as lingua franca of journals. Inside Higher Ed. 13 March 2018. https://bit.ly/2kC2GZfOfford C. German scientists frequently publish in predatory journals. The Scientist. 19 July 2018. https://bit.ly/2kOu3ivOfford C. German scientists frequently publish in predatory journals. The Scientist. 19 July 2018. https://bit.ly/2kOu3ivCourt rules in FTC’s favor against predatory academic publisher OMICS Group; Imposes $50.1 million judgment against defendants that made false claims and hid publishing fees. US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). FTC site. 3 April 2019. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lRcM8GCourt rules in FTC’s favor against predatory academic publisher OMICS Group; Imposes $50.1 million judgment against defendants that made false claims and hid publishing fees. US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). FTC site. 3 April 2019. Visited 12 September 2019. https://bit.ly/2lRcM8G
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.