scieditorScience Editor and PublisherНаучный редактор и издатель2542-02672541-8122АНРИ10.24069/2542-0267-2020-2-123-134scieditor-139Research ArticleOriginal Papers. TranslationsОригинальные статьи. ПереводыContributorship, not authorship: use CRediT to indicate who did whatОпределение авторства по вкладу в науку: использование таксономии CRediThttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-0085ХолкомбА. О.HolcombeA. O.

Холкомб Алекс О., Школа психологии 

г. Сидней

Alex O. Holcombe, School of Psychology

Sydney

 

alex.holcombe@sydney.edu.auУниверситет СиднеяАвстралияThe University of SydneyAustralia20202601202152123134Copyright © Holcombe A.O., 20212021Холкомб А.О.Holcombe A.O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/139

Participation in the writing or revising of a manuscript is, according to many journal guidelines, necessary to be listed as an author of the resulting article. This is the traditional concept of authorship. But there are good reasons to shift to a contributorship model, under which it is not necessary to contribute to the writing or revision of a manuscript, and all those who make substantial contributions to a project are credited. Many journals and publishers have already taken steps in this direction, and further adoption will have several benefi This article makes the case for continuing to move down that path. Use of a contributorship model should improve the ability of universities and funders to identify effective individual researchers and improving their ability to identify the right mix of researchers needed to advance modern science. Other benefi should include facilitating the formation of productive collaborations and the creation of important scientifi tools and software. The CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) taxonomy is a machine-readable standard already incorporated into some journal management systems and it allows incremental transition toward contributorship.

Перевод статьи: Holcombe A. O. Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications. 2019;7(3):48. DOI: 10.3390/publications7030048

В соответствии с традиционной концепцией авторства, которой придерживаются многие научные журналы, авторы публикации должны непременно участвовать в написании или редактировании рукописи. Однако, в настоящее время появляются веские основания пересмотреть эти взгляды и перейти на модель научного вклада (contributorship model), которая исходит из того, что для статуса автора исследователям необязательно участвовать в написании или редактировании статьи и что признание должен получить любой вклад, сделанный в научный проект. Многие журналы и издательства уже двигаются в этом направлении. Настоящая статья посвящена тем преимуществам, которые принесет дальнейшее внедрение этого подхода. Новая модель авторства позволит университетам и грантодателям более эффективно выявлять перспективных научных сотрудников и формировать команды исследователей, а значит, ускорит развитие современной науки. Кроме того, новая модель упростит создание продуктивных коллабораций и разработку важного научного инструментария и программного обеспечения. Таксономия CRediT – машиночитаемый стандарт, встроенный во многие онлайн-системы подачи рукописей, – позволяет осуществить поэтапный переход к новой модели авторства.

авторствостимулирование труда научных работниковфинансированиемета-наукаauthorshipincentivesfundingMeta-scienceReferencesInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Updated December 2018. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2019).International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Updated December 2018. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2019).American Psychological Association. Publication Practices & Responsible Authorship. Available at: https://www.apa.org/research/responsible/publication/ (accessed on 11 June 2019).American Psychological Association. Publication Practices & Responsible Authorship. Available at: https://www.apa.org/research/responsible/publication/ (accessed on 11 June 2019).Rennie D., Yank V., Emanuel L. When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278(7):579–585. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.Rennie D., Yank V., Emanuel L. When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278(7):579–585. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.Patience G. S., Galli F., Patience P. A., Boito D.C. Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0198117. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198117.Patience G. S., Galli F., Patience P. A., Boito D.C. Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0198117. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198117.Resnik D. B. A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1997;3(3):237–243. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5.Resnik D. B. A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1997;3(3):237–243. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5.McNutt M. K., Bradford M., Drazen J. M., Hanson B., Howard B., Jamieson K. H., Kiermer V., Marcus E., Pope B. K., Schekman R. Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. PNAS. 2018;115(11):2557–2560. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115.McNutt M. K., Bradford M., Drazen J. M., Hanson B., Howard B., Jamieson K. H., Kiermer V., Marcus E., Pope B. K., Schekman R. Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. PNAS. 2018;115(11):2557–2560. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115.Nature Publishing Group. Nature Research Journals’ Authorship Policy. Available at: https://www.nature.com/authors/policies/authorship.html (accessed on 11 June 2019).Nature Publishing Group. Nature Research Journals’ Authorship Policy. Available at: https://www.nature.com/authors/policies/authorship.html (accessed on 11 June 2019).Resnik D. B., Tyler A. M., Black J. R., Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016;42(3):199–202. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103171.Resnik D. B., Tyler A. M., Black J. R., Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016;42(3):199–202. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103171.Authorship policies. Nature. 2009;458:1078. DOI: 10.1038/4581078a.Authorship policies. Nature. 2009;458:1078. DOI: 10.1038/4581078a.Greenland P., Fontanarosa P. B. Ending Honorary Authorship. Science. 2012;337(6098):1019. DOI: 10.1126/science.1224988.Greenland P., Fontanarosa P. B. Ending Honorary Authorship. Science. 2012;337(6098):1019. DOI: 10.1126/science.1224988.Kumar S. Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-Authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations. Publications. 2018;6(3):37. DOI: 10.3390/publications6030037.Kumar S. Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-Authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations. Publications. 2018;6(3):37. DOI: 10.3390/publications6030037.Cutas D., Shaw D. Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2015;21(5):1315–1329. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0.Cutas D., Shaw D. Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2015;21(5):1315–1329. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0.Shen S. X. Negotiating authorship in Chinese universities: How organizations shape cycles of credit in science. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2016;41(4):660–685. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915622265.Shen S. X. Negotiating authorship in Chinese universities: How organizations shape cycles of credit in science. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2016;41(4):660–685. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915622265.Beaumont M. A., Rannala B. The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004;5:251–261. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1318.Beaumont M. A., Rannala B. The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004;5:251–261. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1318.Rylance R. Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity. Nature. 2015;525(7569):313–315. DOI: 10.1038/525313a.Rylance R. Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity. Nature. 2015;525(7569):313–315. DOI: 10.1038/525313a.Lyall C., Bruce A., Marsden W., Meagher L. The role of funding agencies in creating interdisciplinary knowledge. Science and Public Policy. 2013;40(1):62–71. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs121.Lyall C., Bruce A., Marsden W., Meagher L. The role of funding agencies in creating interdisciplinary knowledge. Science and Public Policy. 2013;40(1):62–71. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs121.ADAlthousePhD. [Twitter Post]. It’s Kind of Up to Individual Institutions to Police Their Faculty, but Complaining about This Can Make You a Pariah or Get You a Reputation as Being “Diicult” (for the Outrageous Demand of Wanting Credit for Your Work...). Available at: https://twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1104003152964132865 (accessed on 8 March 2019).ADAlthousePhD. [Twitter Post]. It’s Kind of Up to Individual Institutions to Police Their Faculty, but Complaining about This Can Make You a Pariah or Get You a Reputation as Being “Diicult” (for the Outrageous Demand of Wanting Credit for Your Work...). Available at: https://twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1104003152964132865 (accessed on 8 March 2019).Ridley A. Now Is the Time for a Team-Based Approach to Team Science. The Academy of Medical Sciences Website. 2019. Available at: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/more/news/now-is-the-time-for-a-team-based-approach-to-team-science (accessed on 11 May 2019).Ridley A. Now Is the Time for a Team-Based Approach to Team Science. The Academy of Medical Sciences Website. 2019. Available at: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/more/news/now-is-the-time-for-a-team-based-approach-to-team-science (accessed on 11 May 2019).Allen L., Scott J., Brand A., Hlava M., Altman M. Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature. 2014;508(7496):312–313. DOI: 10.1038/508312a.Allen L., Scott J., Brand A., Hlava M., Altman M. Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature. 2014;508(7496):312–313. DOI: 10.1038/508312a.Brand A., Allen L., Altman M., Hlava M., Scott J. Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing. 2015;28(2):151–155. DOI: 10.1087/20150211.Brand A., Allen L., Altman M., Hlava M., Scott J. Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing. 2015;28(2):151–155. DOI: 10.1087/20150211.Allen L., O’Connell A., Kiermer V. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing. 2019;32(1):71–74. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1210.Allen L., O’Connell A., Kiermer V. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing. 2019;32(1):71–74. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1210.PLoS. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/authorship (accessed on 13 March 2019).PLoS. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/authorship (accessed on 13 March 2019).Holcombe A. O., Vazire S., Chartier C. R. Replace Journals’ Writing-Based Authorship Guidelines with a Contributorship Model. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 7–9 July 2019.Holcombe A. O., Vazire S., Chartier C. R. Replace Journals’ Writing-Based Authorship Guidelines with a Contributorship Model. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 7–9 July 2019.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.